Cookie Privacy Preferences
We utilize essential cookies to ensure our website operates effectively and remains secure. Additionally, we'd like to request your permission to use optional cookies. These are intended to enhance your browsing experience by offering personalized content, displaying advertisements that are relevant to you, and helping us to further refine our website.
Choose "Accept all cookies" to agree to the use of both essential and optional cookies. Alternatively, select "Let me see" to customize your preferences.
Privacy Preference Centre
Our website utilizes cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to present you with content tailored to your preferences on this device and browser. Below, you will find detailed information about the function of cookies, enabling you to make informed choices about which cookies you wish to accept. Please note that disabling certain cookies might impact your user experience on our site. It's important to remember that cookie preferences need to be set individually for each device and browser you use. Clearing your browser's cache may also remove your cookie settings. You have the freedom to modify your cookie preferences at any point in the future.
For a comprehensive understanding of our use of cookies, please refer to our complete cookies policy.
These cookies are needed for the website to work and for us to fulfil our contractual obligations. This means they can't be switched off. They enable essential functionality such as security, accessibility and live chat support. They also help us to detect and prevent fraud. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but it means some parts of the site won't work.
These cookies allow us to measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know how popular pages are, and to see how visitors move around the site. If you don't allow these cookies, we won't know when you've visited our site, and we won't be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we've added to our pages. If you don't allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not work properly.
These cookies collect information about your browsing habits to show you personalised adverts. They may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They don't store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you don't allow these cookies, the adverts you see will be less relevant.
FREE DELIVERY on everything
FREE DELIVERY on everything
hello@print-print.co.uk 01952 850 730 |
FREE UK Next Day Delivery
FREE Artwork File Check
White Label Packaging
Like it or not, the August 2013 issue of Rolling Stone magazine could end up being a smart marketing move.
The cover featured Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, otherwise known as “Suspect No. 2” from the horrific bombing of this year’s Boston Marathon. The tagline under his photo reads, “The Bomber. How a popular, promising student was failed by his family, fell into radical Islam and became a monster.”
The controversial cover rightly caused outrage, particularly over social media — it’s been trending on Twitter – and in the blogosphere. Readers are used to seeing musicians, politicians and pop-culture icons glorified on the cover. Not alleged murderers. Not usually, anyway.
The April bombings in Boston left three people dead and more than 250 others injured, some seriously. The tragedy gripped the attention of the entire country and the world, and emotions surrounding the incidents are still raw.
Making Tsarnaev the cover subject was certain to grab the attention of the public. After all, the front cover is a magazine’s prime tool for selling issues, and is often a driver for people buying it, or searching out stories online. The risk, of course, was if the negative attention from this cover caused any of the magazine’s advertisers to pull out. We already know that certain stores in the US have decided not to sell the issue on their newsstands.
On RollingStone.com, the editors published this note about the cover story:
“Our hearts go out to the victims of the Boston Marathon bombing, and our thoughts are always with them and their families. The cover story we are publishing this week falls within the traditions of journalism and Rolling Stone’s long-standing commitment to serious and thoughtful coverage of the most important political and cultural issues of our day. The fact that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is young, and in the same age group as many of our readers, makes it all the more important for us to examine the complexities of this issue and gain a more complete understanding of how a tragedy like this happens”
However Rolling Stone is no stranger to controversial covers. In June 1970, the magazine did a cover story on the murders orchestrated by Charles Manson. In 1980, it published a cover featuring Yoko Ono and a naked John Lennon. In 1993, it published a cover featuring a topless Janet Jackson with a pair of hands covering her breasts.
For entrepreneurs, associating your brand with a controversial subject can be risky business. Young business’ can have a hard time bouncing back after a spout of negative attention.
But like it or not, that cover of the Rolling Stone has accomplished at least one thing: There’s a lot of people talking about Rolling Stone magazine – only time will tell to see if this goes in their favour.
Dean Williams is a design and marketing blogger working for Print-Print Limited, promoting business and building brands through quality print marketing. If you’re interested in small business promotion then please get in touch hello@print-print.co.uk
Get a feel for what we do!
Our FREE sample packs are full of great print ideas. They’ll give you a taste of what to expect when ordering your design and printing from us.
Like it or not, the August 2013 issue of Rolling Stone magazine could end up being a smart marketing move.
The cover featured Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, otherwise known as “Suspect No. 2” from the horrific bombing of this year’s Boston Marathon. The tagline under his photo reads, “The Bomber. How a popular, promising student was failed by his family, fell into radical Islam and became a monster.”
The controversial cover rightly caused outrage, particularly over social media — it’s been trending on Twitter – and in the blogosphere. Readers are used to seeing musicians, politicians and pop-culture icons glorified on the cover. Not alleged murderers. Not usually, anyway.
The April bombings in Boston left three people dead and more than 250 others injured, some seriously. The tragedy gripped the attention of the entire country and the world, and emotions surrounding the incidents are still raw.
Making Tsarnaev the cover subject was certain to grab the attention of the public. After all, the front cover is a magazine’s prime tool for selling issues, and is often a driver for people buying it, or searching out stories online. The risk, of course, was if the negative attention from this cover caused any of the magazine’s advertisers to pull out. We already know that certain stores in the US have decided not to sell the issue on their newsstands.
On RollingStone.com, the editors published this note about the cover story:
“Our hearts go out to the victims of the Boston Marathon bombing, and our thoughts are always with them and their families. The cover story we are publishing this week falls within the traditions of journalism and Rolling Stone’s long-standing commitment to serious and thoughtful coverage of the most important political and cultural issues of our day. The fact that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is young, and in the same age group as many of our readers, makes it all the more important for us to examine the complexities of this issue and gain a more complete understanding of how a tragedy like this happens”
However Rolling Stone is no stranger to controversial covers. In June 1970, the magazine did a cover story on the murders orchestrated by Charles Manson. In 1980, it published a cover featuring Yoko Ono and a naked John Lennon. In 1993, it published a cover featuring a topless Janet Jackson with a pair of hands covering her breasts.
For entrepreneurs, associating your brand with a controversial subject can be risky business. Young business’ can have a hard time bouncing back after a spout of negative attention.
But like it or not, that cover of the Rolling Stone has accomplished at least one thing: There’s a lot of people talking about Rolling Stone magazine – only time will tell to see if this goes in their favour.
Dean Williams is a design and marketing blogger working for Print-Print Limited, promoting business and building brands through quality print marketing. If you’re interested in small business promotion then please get in touch hello@print-print.co.uk
Get a feel for what we do!
Our FREE sample packs are full of great print ideas. They’ll give you a taste of what to expect when ordering your design and printing from us.